Sull'aspetto "Bio" dell'articolo dell'Economist non ho opinioni e argomenti forti.
Questo articolo di Salon riporta bene le opinioni anti-organic di Norman Borloug "If some consumers believe that it's better from the point of view of their health to have organic food, God bless them. Let them buy it. Let them pay a bit more. It's a free society. But don't tell the world that we can feed the present population without chemical fertilizer. That's when this misinformation becomes destructive"
e quelle del Minnesota Institute for Sustainable Agriculture "Hunger is a problem of poverty, distribution, and access to food. The question then, is not "how to feed the world," but rather, how can we develop sustainable farming methods that have the potential to help the world feed and sustain itself. Organic management practices promote soil health, water conservation and can reverse environmental degradation. The emphasis on small-scale family farms has the potential to revitalize rural areas and their economies. Counter to the widely held belief that industrial agriculture is more efficient and productive, small farms produce far more per acre than large farms. Industrial agriculture relies heavily on monocultures, the planting of a single crop throughout the farm, because they simplify management and allow the use of heavy machinery."
lunedì, dicembre 11, 2006
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento